A reply to a the previous Hepatitis C article

A good reply I found on a Hepatits Newsgroup about the Hepatitis C treatment article..

"It is generally accepted..."

I read this all the time. It usually means that original, on point experiments establishing the claim were never done, or were terribly flawed, as is the case for "essential fatty acids," for example. British scientist Harold Hillman wrote an entire book on a few examples of this. Hep C. is a fabrication. Iron probably plays a major role, along with lipid peroxidation and exposure to some (if not many)
"pathogenic organisms." The same nonsense is true of "HIV/AIDS," where the "virus" was never found (even though the technology is available - has been for a long time - and is not especially expensive), but instead protein fragments which are just cellular debris have been declared "markers" of infection. Listen to these people and you are in deep trouble, as I almost was. I was told to take anti-acid medication, but determined by my own research that I needed to take stamach acid and pepsin supplements, which I still do to this day, several years later, with no signs of the original "disease," no thanks to "modern medicine." Interestingly, I purchased an old Cycopedia of Medicine from circa 1920 and that was the only refernce for using stomach acid supplementation. These "experts" have "gone backwards,"
though the technology has advanced, and creates an image of "great achievements," depsite the incredible failures of the "war on cancer," the "AIDS vaccine" (which is an impossiblity), etc.